Sign up
Log in
Judge Tosses Trump's $15 Billion Case Against New York Times, President Claims He's 'Winning'
Share
Listen to the news

A federal judge in Tampa rejected President Donald Trump‘s $15 billion defamation lawsuit against The New York Times (NYSE:NYT) on Friday, labeling the filing as “decidedly improper.” Judge Steven Merryday gave Trump 28 days to resubmit the lawsuit, with a 40-page limit.

The lawsuit targets the NYT, four of its reporters, and Penguin Random House over the book ‘Lucky Loser: How Donald Trump Squandered His Father’s Fortune and Created the Illusion of Success‘, written by Times reporters Susanne Craig and Russ Buettner. Trump accused the newspaper of serving as a “mouthpiece” for the Democratic Party and making illegal campaign contributions, according to CNBC.

Trump Claims Victory Despite Dismissal

After the dismissal, Trump told ABC News, “I’m winning, I’m winning the cases,” before criticizing ABC and NBC as “terrible” networks.

See Also: Dave Ramsey's ‘Zero Credit' Doctrine Challenged By ProtÃĐgÃĐ: The New Rules For Building Wealth In 2025

Judge Merryday pointed out that the complaint focused more on “boasting” than providing substantial legal arguments.

Pattern of Media Litigation

This lawsuit is part of Trump's ongoing legal battles with major media companies. In July, he filed a $10 billion defamation lawsuit against News Corp (NASDAQ:NWSA) (NASDAQ:NWS) over a report linking him to Jeffrey Epstein's birthday greetings in 2003.

Trump also secured a $16 million settlement from Paramount Skydance (NASDAQ:PSKY) over a “60 Minutes” interview with Kamala Harris, though the company didn't apologize or admit wrongdoing. The settlement led Sen. Elizabeth Warren to call for an investigation into Trump's alleged “secret side deal” with Paramount.

Trump’s legal spokesperson confirmed continued pursuit of the “powerhouse lawsuit” in accordance with the judge’s direction, emphasizing holding “Fake News accountable.”

According to the reports, NYT dismissed the original complaint as “a political document rather than a serious legal filing,” welcoming the judge’s quick ruling that recognized the complaint’s political nature over legal substance.

Read Next:

Photo by Tada Images via Shutterstock

Disclaimer:This article represents the opinion of the author only. It does not represent the opinion of Webull, nor should it be viewed as an indication that Webull either agrees with or confirms the truthfulness or accuracy of the information. It should not be considered as investment advice from Webull or anyone else, nor should it be used as the basis of any investment decision.
What's Trending
No content on the Webull website shall be considered a recommendation or solicitation for the purchase or sale of securities, options or other investment products. All information and data on the website is for reference only and no historical data shall be considered as the basis for judging future trends.